Search found 12 matches
- Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:34 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: error in multiple membership models
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7217
Re: error in multiple membership models
Thank you very much for the time and info, George.
- Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:10 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: error in multiple membership models
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7217
Re: error in multiple membership models
Thank you very much, George.
I tried attaching the data in Stata format but it didn't work so I am attaching the data in excel format.
Have a great weekend ahead.
sort pid wave_obs
capture noisily runmlwin yhousetenure3_b cons, level2(pid: cons, residuals(u1a)) level1(wave_obs:) discrete ...
I tried attaching the data in Stata format but it didn't work so I am attaching the data in excel format.
Have a great weekend ahead.
sort pid wave_obs
capture noisily runmlwin yhousetenure3_b cons, level2(pid: cons, residuals(u1a)) level1(wave_obs:) discrete ...
- Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:45 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: error in multiple membership models
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7217
error in multiple membership models
Hi.
I am estimating a multiple-membership multinomial model (3 categories for the response outcome) using a data with 23712 person-year records. If a person is in cohabiting relationship, I am implicitly assuming that his / her random effect is a weighted function of each partner's random effect ...
I am estimating a multiple-membership multinomial model (3 categories for the response outcome) using a data with 23712 person-year records. If a person is in cohabiting relationship, I am implicitly assuming that his / her random effect is a weighted function of each partner's random effect ...
- Fri Sep 07, 2012 4:02 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: signs of covariates change using multiple membership model
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4066
signs of covariates change using multiple membership model
I am estimating a residential mobility (logistic) model whose covariate effects vary according to marital status: whether single or whether couples. One of the covariates is the number of years living in current address. Intuitively, we would expect negative duration effects on the probability of a ...
- Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:01 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: can't proceed to multiple membership model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6596
Re: can't proceed to multiple membership model
Thanks for the quick response, George.
You are right about the intercepts, this should be the case:
g Xlone = single_multiple == 1
g Xmultiple = single_multiple == 0
But the problem still persisted. Per your advice, I removed all the fixed parts and retained only the intercepts: Xsingle and ...
You are right about the intercepts, this should be the case:
g Xlone = single_multiple == 1
g Xmultiple = single_multiple == 0
But the problem still persisted. Per your advice, I removed all the fixed parts and retained only the intercepts: Xsingle and ...
- Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:25 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: can't proceed to multiple membership model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6596
can't proceed to multiple membership model
Hi.
Using panel data, I am trying to estimate a logistic model (on the probability of a residential move) that varies according to an individual's hhld membership: (single-person household vs. couple/multiple-member hhld) (Kindly see attached file equation.jpg). I have 35 explanatory variables ...
Using panel data, I am trying to estimate a logistic model (on the probability of a residential move) that varies according to an individual's hhld membership: (single-person household vs. couple/multiple-member hhld) (Kindly see attached file equation.jpg). I have 35 explanatory variables ...
- Sun Aug 05, 2012 7:27 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: indicator functions for logistic models
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6618
Re: indicator functions for logistic models
Thank you very much for the detailed response, George.
I think you're right, I should also interact the intercept with cohabiting status. Hopefully, that will solve the problem. Thanks again
I think you're right, I should also interact the intercept with cohabiting status. Hopefully, that will solve the problem. Thanks again
- Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:43 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: indicator functions for logistic models
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6618
indicator functions for logistic models
Hi.
Using panel data, I am trying to estimate a logistic model (on the probability of a residential move) that varies according to an individual's marital status: (single vs. cohabiting relationship) (Kindly see attached file equation.jpg). I have 35 explanatory variables. Since, across time an ...
Using panel data, I am trying to estimate a logistic model (on the probability of a residential move) that varies according to an individual's marital status: (single vs. cohabiting relationship) (Kindly see attached file equation.jpg). I have 35 explanatory variables. Since, across time an ...
- Thu Jul 26, 2012 2:14 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: unable to allocate 888379 k. worksheet size unchange
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5242
unable to allocate 888379 k. worksheet size unchange
Hi.
I am trying to estimate a 2-level multinomial model. The dependent variable has 4 categories and I have about 35 explanatory variables. I am working on with a data set with 83,123 records. Unfortunately, everytime I use runmlwin to estimate the model, I keep on receiving an error that says ...
I am trying to estimate a 2-level multinomial model. The dependent variable has 4 categories and I have about 35 explanatory variables. I am working on with a data set with 83,123 records. Unfortunately, everytime I use runmlwin to estimate the model, I keep on receiving an error that says ...
- Sun Jul 08, 2012 10:59 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: multilevel modeling using panel data - matrix must be positi
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9185
Re: multilevel modeling using panel data - matrix must be po
Thanks a lot, George.
You're right, the 0's should not be there. However, the 0's correspond to the base categories of the categorical variables X1, X9, X14 and X17. I was able to proceed to MCMC estimation after creating dummy variables for these four variables (and excluding the base categories ...
You're right, the 0's should not be there. However, the 0's correspond to the base categories of the categorical variables X1, X9, X14 and X17. I was able to proceed to MCMC estimation after creating dummy variables for these four variables (and excluding the base categories ...